The Impact of Monetary Policy on Bank Profitability

This chapter analyzes the effect of the monetary policy on both net interest margin and bank profitability using a panel data from 31 OECD countries over the period 2000–2017. The main results show that expansionary monetary policy measures adopted in numerous economies had a negative impact on net interest margins and, therefore, on bank profitability. The relationship between interest rates and the slope of the yield curve with both the net interest margin and profitability is non-linear, more specifically concave. This suggests that the negative impact of low interest rates and the flat yield curve is greater the lower and flattened they are, respectively. Therefore, a potential normalization of monetary policy would have highly beneficial effects on restoring margins and profitability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic €32.70 /Month

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

eBook EUR 85.59 Price includes VAT (France)

Softcover Book EUR 105.49 Price includes VAT (France)

Hardcover Book EUR 105.49 Price includes VAT (France)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Similar content being viewed by others

Interest Rates and Net Interest Margins: The Impact of Monetary Policy

Chapter © 2017

The determinants of net interest margin during transition

Article 08 November 2018

Determinants of bank’s interest margin in the aftermath of the crisis: the effect of interest rates and the yield curve slope

Article 19 December 2017

Notes

Some papers find that monetary policy is less effective in stimulating credit growth when interest rates are very low (Borio and Gambacorta 2017), and other studies even find that negative interest rates have a contracting effect on the credit supply (Heider et al. 2018; Brunnermeier and Koby 2018). The paper of Arce et al. (2018) suggests that there is no significant difference between the volume of credit offered by banks affected or not by negative interest rates.

Austria, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Switzerland, Colombia, Czech Republic, Germany, Denmark, Spain, Finland, France, United Kingdom, Greece, Ireland, Iceland, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Latvia, Netherlands, Norway, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, Russian Federation, Sweden, Slovenia, Slovak Republic, United States and South Africa.

As there are no data in the databases used about the number of employees for the entire sample, the ratio of staff cost to total assets as a proxy for the price of labor has been used, instead of the ratio of staff cost to number of employees.

Note that the cost function differs from the traditional one in that it includes, in addition to the financial and operational costs, the provisions that a bank sets aside each year (as a proxy ex-post of the cost of risk). Given that the cost is included in the dependent variable, it has been necessary to include the unit cost of this productive input that we can call “risk” as a determinant, approximating as a ratio between financial asset impairment losses and the volume of lending.

Note that this ratio is a measure of capitalization and presents limitations as a measure of risk aversion, since it includes the minimum capital required by the regulation. However, unfortunately, there is no better proxy for this variable.

Unfortunately, the interest rates for Japan between 2000 and 2002 are not available.

References

Acknowledgments

I am gratefully acknowledge financial support of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (research project ECO2017-84858-R) and Spanish Ministry of Education (FPU2014/00936).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economic Analysis, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain Paula Cruz-García
  1. Paula Cruz-García